Fifty Years Later, Why Does ‘Eichmann in Jerusalem’ Remain Contentious?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorKirsch, Adam
dc.contributor.authorGalchen, Rivka
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-29T19:10:00Z
dc.date.available2017-12-29T19:10:00Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-26
dc.description.abstractAdam Kirsch and Rivka Galchen discuss why Hannah Arend't book remains controversial fifty years after it was written. Click on the link above to read the article.en_US
dc.description.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11976/239
dc.identifier.urihttps://nyti.ms/2jO3hnG
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNw York Timesen_US
dc.subjectArendt, Hannahen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectSocial Critics and Social Criticismen_US
dc.subjectEichmann in Jerusalemen_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.titleFifty Years Later, Why Does ‘Eichmann in Jerusalem’ Remain Contentious?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeWeb Page

Files

Collections

Philosophy